Offensive? Maybe

There are a few issues I feel like addressing. If any of it offends you there are plenty of other blogs and pages on the Internet to read or view.

I'll start with this image. I assume some dimwitted asshole thinks that former President Obama was a Muslim, Kenyan, socialist who kicked Jesus out of the White House. Since there is supposed to be a separation of church and state a reasonable Harvard Law School educated, duly elected, constitutional scholar would understand that he may hold any personal religious beliefs he wants but that he is forbidden from pushing them on to the citizens he has been elected to lead. Now we have a Republican President who has no idea what being a Christian means aside from being one of the tools in his bag of tricks to fool the feeble minded who can't see through his veil of bullshit. It would seem that Republicans would not be too keen on Jesus. He was after all a Jew from the Middle East. He went around telling folks to take care of the poor. He provided free health care to all even to the point of raising the dead. Clearly our current President would not want anyone to raise the dead for fear they would vote in the next election along with those millions of illegals that no one can seem to locate.

The only thing that surprises me about this one is that the two folks pictured appear to be white. Of course if the slope headed moron who developed this would take a little time to do some research he (it has to be a man) would discover that the states with the largest numbers of folks receiving government benefits are ruled by Republicans (read conservatives).

I rather enjoyed this one. Perhaps the proposed Secretary of Education should learn a little bit about sentence construction in the English language. To quote her perspective boss: "She needs to work on this bigly."

 Once again some idiot decided to post something that makes zero sense. Women marched to defend their rights not because any had been taken away by the President. They are working to maintain the gains they have made and not to take any steps backward. In addition, it appears from what he has said in the past he does intend to take away some of their rights. He opposes equal pay, he intends and has moved to restrict abortion rights. So, what is wrong with putting the President on notice that if those rights are restrict in an manner there will be a political price he will pay as a result? I recall plenty of protests about former President Obama allegedly taking away gun rights and confiscating guns even though neither happened.

In an effort to be a little bit balanced in my commentary I do agree with the above. Both political parties should be interested in what helps the American people and not just in the bullshit they have been scooping to get reelected.

Since this is my blog and I have a beard I agree with this. Well unless of course the current occupant of the White House grows a beard. He would still be a problem in my opinion.